Schism, Heresy and the Standard of Catholic Unity [Updated]

Leo Cleaves to Francis and Like Him Breaks from Christ in Doctrine and In Usurping Office; Catholic Faithful May Not Be In Union With Leo--Never the Twain Shall Meet

Yes Virginia, There was a Gay Cross at Mass at the Vatican on Saturday NurPhoto via Getty

In brief reply to a question yesterday over at Fr. Nix’s site, whether Leo is in heresy, I submit the following. This topic is a Big Fish, and truly requires a longer more in-depth study, which I am happy to undertake in future, but for the moment offer this brief outline from which one can begin his own research, in order to (as a man must) work out his own salvation in fear and trembling.

Leo Cleaves to Francis and Like Him Breaks from Christ In Doctrine AND In Usurping Office

First, Leo by his own admission from Day One states he will faithfully follow — not Christ — but Francis, and has proven true to his word in all respects. For a review of the heresies of Francis, in case anyone has forgot, missed them, or is not familiar with them as every Catholic should be, I invite the reader’s attention to the Denzinger Bergoglio website here: https://en-denzingerbergoglio.com/ . This is a great resource for Francis Heresies at your fingertips and a comprehensive project by learned priests available on-line and in PDF format.

Frankly, it is hard to believe anyone could forget, because I recall Francis as offering a heresy du jour in his prime. He was like Mike Tyson — before whom no Truth of the Faith could stand. No one in Hell? Nope. But if so, no problem, your soul is extinguished. Luther a saint? No problem, better than Judas. Oh, Bergoglio started the Cult of Judas also.¹ No Sanctifying Grace? Nope, no need, God loves you bad, and made you that way in case you’re gay and were wondering.

Thus, turning to Leo’s spiritual father, creator and rabbi Francis first, because the continuity in doctrine upon examination is quite obvious, my two choice picks as obvious documented examples of Bergoglio’s rampant heresies are his denial of Sanctifying Grace — and more specifically the denial of the need of Sanctifying Grace for any person to become right with God — in Amoralis Laetitia [pun intended], and his ratification of sodomy in Fiducia Supplicans (FS). Leo has been a fervent supporter of FS, both before and after his Usurpation of the Petrine See, as is obvious from the public record, and especially this past weekend with the Sodomfolk Parade taking place in the Vatican itself, with “bespoke” Mass by a Francis/Leo-swishop for the assembled in all their rainbow splendor Un-Naturals.

Charming Crowd Dresses Up(?) for Church Update photo: Get a Closeup on the Claw.

Please NOTE WELL that Anti-Pope Leo personally approved the Mass (and the foreseeable desecration) that ensued on Saturday in St. Peter’s Basilica by Bishop Francesco Savino, vice-president of the Italian Bishops Conference for the homosexual march on St Peter's Basilica, from the horse’s mouth itself: according to Bishop Savino himself as he said during his homily. They think we the Dumb Sheep are so stupid they do not even hide the truth at times.

Furthermore, it is absolutely impossible that the Mass and March of the Sodomfolk could possibly have happened inside the Vatican without Leo’s express permission. That is not how governments work. It was broadcast by one of the Sodomfolk Movement’s chief architects, Neo-Jesuit James Martin of New York City — as well as by his fellow-traveller media and activist co-conspirators — months in advance. He met with Leo Go Lightly the week before. Everything at the level of Head of State is choreographed — down to the most minute detail — on one’s home turf especially. Even Leo’s absence at Borgo Laudato S(odom)i was in my view planned in conjunction with this invasion so as to provide Leo Go Lightly the slimmest fig leaf of plausible deniability.

Update: Believe Nothing Until It Is Officially Denied

Thank you! Vatican Press Office — which just confirmed by denying. Spokeperson Matteo Bruni who you can reliably tell is lying by when his lips are moving confirmed today (September 11) my conclusion that Leo personally ok’d the event by stating at a presser that "the event itself was organised . . . without the involvement of the Holy See.” In other words, “Do not pay attention to that man behind the curtain!”

This is in accord with the old Vatican saw that one believes nothing in the Eternal City, until it is officially denied. Grazie, Bruni.

fini Update

Also, one may easily peruse who (and what) got the concession for the bistro at the Borgo Laudato Si: a celebrity chef and his husband(?) out of Chicago ( clientele Oprah, N’Obama (Keep the Change), & Gag-me Lady ).

Leo Go Lightly is not very subtle when he wants to be.

Please note that the blessings of couples openly engaged in the Sodomfolk lifestyle involves not only the endorsement of the unnatural vice, but also the blasphemy of profaning the name of Our Lord Jesus Christ. This has been addressed by other authors here: https://www.fromrome.info/2024/01/05/fiducia-supplicans-is-an-attack-on-the-2nd-commandment-of-the-decalogue/ .

Bishop Strickland too has clearly declared that same-sex blessings of Fiducia Supplicans are blasphemous. Bishop Strickland also calls out the primary blasphemy in Amoralis Laetitia:

“So we must speak clearly: Same-sex blessings are blasphemy; [and] Mercy without repentance is a lie.”

When Wolves Wear Vestments: The Synodal Siege Within the Church

I and others have noted before that like Francis, Leo denies Christ’s miracles and on numerous occasions His Divinity. Furthermore, he has blasphemed the Holy Ghost several times as well, most ludicrously in claiming that He supports open borders.

A good list — a sort of Denzinger Leo — of the many unorthodox, un-Catholic and rank blasphemous statements of Leo in his short (100 day) tenure as Anti-Pope are catalogued by Brother Alexis Bugnolo here: https://www.fromrome.info/?s=Prevost.

Usurpation Only Begets Usurpation—Benedict FORCED TO RESIGN

There is little doubt — again amply available from the public record but also confirmed to me recently by an insider of one of the U.S. intelligence 3-letter agencies — that Benedict was forced from office in 2013 in an operation by the St. Gallen Mafia with the explicit collusion of the United States Deep State under President Obama and the Globalist international finance community (as evidenced by, inter alia just the tip of the iceberg, the SWIFT banking system cutting off the Vatican from access to SWIFT — tantamount to financial strangulation and blackmail — in the days immediately preceding Benedict’s announcement of his abdication on February 11, 2013 A. D. — with access restored the day after he made the announcement).

On the Deep Church side: Ted McCarrick admitted at his Villanova Speech in October 2013 that the conclave was a set-up with outside interference (the mysterious influential Italian Gentleman businessman), as inadvertently did Austin Ivereigh in his hagiography of Cormac Murphy O’Connor, as did the Belgian creep Danneels, all three prelates card-carrying members of the St. Gallen Mafia.

If Benedict was coerced, his putative resignation is invalid under Canon Law. See Canon 188, which states, “A resignation made out of grave fear that is inflicted unjustly or out of malice, substantial error, or simony is invalid by the law itself.”

It follows perforce that any conclave that followed this putative resignation — in this case the Conclave of 2013 — is invalid, null and void, of no effect.

And it follows from that that Bergoglio was never a valid pope.

From Frying Pan to Fire: Or, From One Usurper to Another

How does that bear on Leo Go Lightly Riggitano-Prevost?

Well, Francis appointed fully 80% (108 out of 135) voting cardinals at the conclave of 2025. You cannot have a valid conclave with 80% or more illegitimate voting cardinals. Some who grant that Francis was an illegitimate pope and even an anti-pope will nonetheless argue happlessly and in complete ignorance of canon law and Church history that the doctrine of Ecclesia Supplet — or supplied jurisdiction — cures these invalid Bergolian cardinal appointments but the very theory of supplied jurisdiction presupposes good faith and good will on the part of the poor actor, Antipope or other clergy, otherwise lacking in jurisdiction or rightful power.

It is my considered opinion that Francis spent his entire anti-papacy attempting to destroy Holy Mother Church. Why would Our Lord supply jurisdiction to actions furthering such an aim? We can argue all day about Bergolio’s agenda, but these happless (if well-meaning) folk concede he was trying to destroy the Church. So, for them especially their appeal to Ecclesia Supplet lacks all merit.

Let me put it plainly.

All Francis’s official acts and appointments are utterly lacking in validity and force and effect as a matter of legitimacy, or de jure. They are the mere de facto diktats of a merciless dictator.

So, first, Leo was elected by a kangaroo conclave. The conclave membership itself was a bunch of clown-kangaroos in red hats — or, illegitimate ab initio.

Second, as Steve Bannon and Ben Harnwell called it immediately, Leo’s election was rigged — the outcome determined in advance of the Conclave. They reasoned (quite rightly) that it was impossible for the complete unknown Riggitano-Prevost to cross the line in one day of balloting had he not been set up to win by Francis and his minions. Recall, Francis made him Bishop ten years ago; but more tellingly made him chief and head of the Dicastery for Bishops — the Vatican bishop factory — in 2023, then quickly topped a red hat on his head, because to be pope you first had to be cardinal.

Now, everyone on the Left now admits that Prevost was chosen in advance by Bergoglio. It takes a while for the dummkopfs on the clerical right and in Trad Inc. to admit the patently obvious.

Recall Cardinal Wuerl — another McCarrick acolyte and card-carrying member of the Lavender Mafia — was caught on film in St. Peter’s Square on Day One of Riggitano-Prevost’s faux-election grinning like the Cheshire Cat that just ate the mouse. I would wager ten to one that Wuerl — as a good card-carrying member of the McCarrick Club — already knew Prevost was in, and he wasn’t even inside the conclave.

The Standard of Schism is Christ: Rest Easy in rejecting His Anti-Vicar

Even if schism is defined as unity with the pope, one must recall that the pope is the Vicar on earth of Christ. This dictum of the Catechism does not apply to an anti-pope. The Catechism presupposes a Catholic pope and a valid pope. Fortunately, given the misfortune of an invalid pope squatting on St. Peter’s See — as in the current case of an Anti-Pope — you do not stand in judgment upon a pope as to his Catholicity. The Catholicity of an Anti-pope, rather, or lack thereof can be safely discerned by even a layman, as in the case of Francis and Leo, with no risk of judgment of the See of Peter.²

Therefore, one may rest easy in conscience in rejecting Riggitano-Prevost Anti-Pope Leo and all his unorthodox, heterodox, un-Catholic, sacrilegious and blasphemous blather, deeds and words — of just his First 100 Days. Brace yourself for more of the same.

If an Anti-pope, hence an Anti-Vicar of Christ. Recall Bergoglio Leo’s Master rejected the title Vicar of Christ completely, in an uncharacteristic honest moment.

Leo is not a true pope. He is our second False Pope in a row, after likewise our second Faux Conclave in a row. Lord, deliver us from these lavender jackals.

Leo is, however, the pope of Gay New Ways, and the green Pope of Greta & Globalism.

Leo is Francis Cubed, a shill for the Soros New World Order, both products of the miscegenation and marriage of Obama Chicago Mafia-style Deep State, with McCarrick/Bernardin Chicago Lavender Mafia-style Deep Church.

All of Leo’s antics at Borgo Laudato Si and in his personal grant to the Sodomfolk Sit-In at St. Peter’s Basilica this weekend, as well as his pure 100% unadulterated Bergoglian provenance, prove beyond a reasonable doubt that he is a False Pope.

1. The Bergoglian Cult of Judas, and Bergoglio’s hideous Judas-Jesus portrait, is something Leo favorably spoke of, by the way, in one of his early interviews after his Usurpation.

2. As I like to say, there have been approximately 39 Anti-Popes in Church history prior to Francis (Frankie Forty) and Leo (the Forty-First), but they at least in the main had the decency to be Catholic.