A Pandemic of Poofs

Sodomfolk Pandemic Plaguing Vatican, Clergy, and Bishoprics

"The message I received from him [Leo Riggitano-Prevost] was loud and clear: he wants to continue with the approach [to LGBTQ Catholic ministry] advanced by [Anti-]Pope Francis, which was one of openness and welcome. So it was a hopeful message of continuity."

--Fr. James Martin, Eth. J.

Feast of Pope St. (Beppo Sarto) Pius Xth

Recently, Leo Riggitano-Prevost — sounding just like a modern American Seamless Garment Bishop — lamented “the Pandemic of Guns,” laying responsibility on US gun policy for the savage murder during a Mass of two small Catholic children. Leo Go Lightly failed to note the trans-nature of the shooter, a confused and bitter young man mutilated and masquerading as a female. Any unpleasant truth marring the homosexual ideal is, curiously, always and consistently avoided by Leo Riggitano-Prevost. Thus, LRP diverts attention away from the sorry and tragic psychological and metaphysical status of the murderer, and much more proximate and obvious cause of the mass killing.

Yet these are the kind of men that the now-thankfully-dead Francis, and McCarrick (ditto), and now Leo in their footsteps specialize in creating, through the appointment, protection, advancement, and support of homosexual leaning priests and prelates — like the two pictured above — throughout leadership and high-management positions in the Church. Leo Go Lightly and his minions like the bishop of Charlotte would bring such a real and present danger of the Pandemic of Poofs to a church near you. They would have it no other way, in fact.

Regarding the Pederasty Crisis (sometimes mistakenly referred to as the Pedophilia Crisis) in the Church, raging without abatement publicly, since the Boston Globe exposé, for the past 25 years, of clerical¹ homosexual predators raping boys, Pope Benedict the Last Pope hit the nail on the head as to CAUSATION of the Crisis in one of his three major papal interventions from exile. (Nota Bene: Pope Benedict didn’t just wear white, remain at the Vatican, say “You Can Call Me Pope,” and issue the Apostolic Blessing; he also fed the sheep and strengthened the faithful in the Faith by issuing such cries, a cri de couer, if you will — let him who has ears to hear, HEAR! — thus exercising the Papal Charge, even while yielding all earthly power of ministry to the Lavender Mafia of Francis, McCarrick, Murphy-O’Connor, Kaspar and Marx.)

In his Apostolic Letter, which came out on or around April 8, 2019, in an obscure Bavarian parish bulletin, Pope Benedict astutely charged that homosexuals in the seminaries and by extension in the chanceries — among other indirect societal factors like the growing acceptance of pornography and normalization of the unspeakable crime pedophilia, as well as the rejection of objective moral norms and Thomistic philosophy — caused the Pederasty Crisis in the Catholic Church. The full text of this Apostolic Letter may be found here: https://www.catholicnewsagency.com/news/41013/full-text-of-benedict-xvi-essay-the-church-and-the-scandal-of-sexual-abuse.

It bears noting that this Letter followed the Summer of Shame — starring Ted McCarrick, first in a tale from the crypt, the Sacristy of St Patrick’s Cathedral, but later with more explosive eye-witness allegations from his abuse of then 11-year-old James Grein, family friend(!) — where even pro-Sodomfolk Anti-Pope Francis was compelled to call a synod on priestly sex abuse if for no other reason than to quell the public uproar, and in part to short-circuit the American bishops’ feeble attempts to address the issue and the related equally explosive revelation that Cardinal Ted McCarrick, as head of the child protection effort among the US Catholic Bishops for years had expressly (most conveniently for himself and others fat-cat prelates similarly situated) excluded bishops from any penalty for such crimes against children.

You will recall Francis the False expressly forbad the American bishops from addressing the problem at their annual October 2018 meeting in Baltimore (which suited those jellyfish just fine). He called his synod instead for February 2019, to allegedly deal with the issue. For this event, the true Pope, Benedict, prepared his letter, addressing the worldwide synodal bishops.

Pope Benedict had it delivered to Francis and Parolin for distribution to the bishops at the synod at Rome, and the two of them promptly deep-sixed it. Francis the False and Parolin his henchman threw it posthaste into the waste-paper out-basket, where like Benedict’s report — the Dossier on the Lavender Mafia in the Church— never saw the light of day. In this case, Pope Benedict had other ideas, however.

Likewise, Francis forbad any mention of the word “homosexual” at the synod examining the casues of the Pederasty Crisis. Nothing scarier than the truth, is there ol’ boy. The last thing Francis would do would be to let Benedict teach the bishops anything, and more importantly, put his finger onthe problem: Francis’s own dear to his heart homosexual cause.

Francis’s act in calling the robber synod of 2019 puts me in mind of the O.J. Simpson murder trial in 1994. Upon acquittal Mr. Simpson vowed to “begin the investigation to find the murderer.” The good ol’ N. Y. Post roundly set that one up, with a brutally honest cartoon of O.J. in Sherlock Holmes mode, following a set of bloody footprints around his kitchen counter leading right back to him.

Because Anti-Pope Francis shut out and shut down Pope Benedict at the 2019 Synod, Pope Benedict released it directly to the press himself, via a small parish paper in Bavaria—from which the international press soon picked it up including the N. Y. Times and The Atlantic, and ran with it mostly to slander Benedict. Few Catholics ever heard about it, much less read it — it’s about thirty pages long. And for some reason, which is a shame, we seem to like to forget about Pope Benedict.

“There were — [and] not only in the United States of America — individual bishops who rejected the Catholic tradition as a whole and sought to bring about a kind of new, modern ‘Catholicity’ in their dioceses.” This included bishops corrupting their seminaries by forcing the seminarians to watch pornography, as Pope Benedict noted.

In regard to seminaries, Pope Benedict explosively wrote: “As regards the problem of preparation for priestly ministry in seminaries, there is in fact a far-reaching breakdown of the previous form of this preparation. In various seminaries homosexual cliques were established, which acted more or less openly and significantly changed the climate in the seminaries.”

He attributes this infestation (or plague…or Pandemic) directly giving rise to the Pederast Crisis. He warns clerics, bishops in particular — although it would also apply to Anti-Popes like Francis and Leo — to, in a word, better read up on millstones.

“In light of the scale of pedophilic misconduct, a word of Jesus has again come to attention which says: ‘Whoever causes one of these little ones who believe in me to sin, it would be better for him if a great millstone were hung round his neck and he were thrown into the sea’ (Mark 9:42).

“The phrase ‘the little ones’ in the language of Jesus means the common believers who can be confounded in their faith by the intellectual arrogance of those who think they are clever. [Leo, Fr. Martin and Bishop Martin, anyone?] So here Jesus protects the deposit of the faith with an emphatic threat of punishment to those who do it harm.”

While some critics, like Fr. Martin fellow homo-traveller Fr. Thomas Reese at the liberal and gay National Catholic Reporter, dismissed Pope Benedict’s claims and pointed out that many abusers came from a pre-Vatican II seminary culture, Fr. Reese neglects to report on the level of homosexual culture there, too; the comparative level of abuse between the two eras; and certainly fails to address Pope Benedict’s points on the actual merits of what Pope Benedict said.

And in any case, the Catholic Church never saw such an explosion of clerical monsters on both left and right (Maciel being the bete noir for conservatives although the Legion always struck me as a cult) as oozed out of the overall mire of the Sixties and Seventies, a flow that Francis and Leo are doing their damnedest to perpetuate, as their protection since 2013 to date of a plethora of high-profile clerical rapists like ‘Fr.’ Rupnik and Leo’s cases in Lima continues to prove.

Leo’s promotions to the episcopate are also — like Francis’s — heavily homosexual. Francis put Leo in charge of the bishop factory in 2023 — to keep the gay fount flowing, which Riggitano Prevost did so well that he got promoted to anti-pope.

The Lavender Mafia and Francis its chief with it is not so stupid as to put an untrusted lackey in such a critical position of supplying all the world with bishops. You’ve seen what we’ve gotten, Gentle Reader, and if you still think Leo’s Catholic, you need stronger medicine than I’ve got.

Facta non Verba

So no matter what Leo says about Things Catholic, or that marriage is between a man and a woman, his personnel decisions indicate his policy — a topic I have visited before in Leo’s Lavender Landslide (here: dumbsheepinthepew.substack.com/p/leos-lavender-landslide ) — which is 100% pro-homosexual. Personnel is policy. Tucho Fernandez says it all. Leo’s lavender appointments to bishoprics are resulting in gay lovefests in dioceses all over the world, with there soon to be an LGBT March to Rome itself at his behest (like tomorrow, September 5).

Leo Riggitano-Prevost is pro Fiducia Supplicans all the way, first as prelate and now as false pope.

Benedict On the Trans Shooting — Tragedy for and Travesty in the Church Leads to the Same for Society

Benedict’s letter also speaks to root causes of the trans shooting as well—not the first among us by the way, more like the tenth in recent years, as Fr. Nix pointed out in the following graphic:

In this regard to this unspeakable crime (in both senses, both against and by the murderer), Pope Benedict notes that, “At individual points it becomes suddenly apparent that what is evil and destroys man has become a matter of course.”

What happens when the Church fails to teach is the world goes mad.

Pope Benedict continues:

“That is the case with pedophilia. It was theorized only a short time ago as quite legitimate, but it has spread further and further. And now we realize with shock that things are happening to our children and young people that threaten to destroy them. The fact that this could also spread in the Church and among priests ought to disturb us in particular.” (Emphasis added.)

The fact that this insane philosophy of Sodomy First could and actually has spread like a cancer, plague, or a pandemic, to the highest levels of the Church — as evinced by Leo’s soft and soothing mutterings of sweet nothings in Fr. James Martin’s ear — combined with his actions designed to destroy what’s left of the Faith out there in such places as Charlotte, N. Carolina and elsewhere by his poisonous appointments to the episcopal sees — is most disturbing of all.

Pope Benedict’s solution—laid out in outline in his valiant Apostolic Letter of April 2019—is this: Reform of the Seminaries and Chanceries — drive the homosexual clerics, enablers, and wanna-be clerics, out. OUT. As in, in the immortal words of Chef Skinner of Ratatouille: “You’re Fired! F! I! R! E! D! FIRED!

And thus, we may defend the Good of the Faith and of the Church, as well as uphold our solemn duty to Protect and Defend the Little Ones.

The alternative, Gentle Reader, is for us all to read up on millstones.

Post Script — On the Charlotte Massacre as Leo’s Last Chance at Catholic

A Moment of Revelation Looms

This Labor Day I am fresh back from a trip down South to Charlotte, North Carolina with a stop on the way home at Harpers Ferry in West Virginia. I scouted out today’s premier battlefield of the War for the Soul of the Catholic Church, currently raging with demonic fury in the Diocese of Charlotte.

In Charlotte, I attended several Traditional Latin Masses at various locales to get a sense from the locals of what they think of the pending Latin Mass Suppression and closures. October 2, 2025 A. D. is the date the guillotine drops, by the way, a month to the day. No good news is on the horizon, despite a meeting with the four pastors of the Latin Mass parishes with ‘Bishop’ Michael T. Martin last week.

The rank and file — the dumb sheep in the pew, so to speak — seem resigned to the inevitable, which is destruction of the T.L.M. with all Masses closed and anyone daring still to attend and pray the Old Latin Mass, consigned to a ghetto parish forty-five minutes north of downtown Charlotte in what can only be described as a converted Protestant Barn. Others, to my mind naive folks, in the Charlotte parishes are foolishly saying a novena “for” their bishop and putative pope, Martin and Leo, rather than for their rapid defeat and demise. One such person told me that the bishop just didn’t know the Old Latin Mass (“Oh, if he could only see it!”), which I found to be an incredulous belief of a man with twenty odd years of ‘Catholic’ education, and twenty plus as a priest, as I tactfully told her.

The most insightful man whom I met across four parishes there — a Catholic mystic with a career experience in extra-sensory perception for one of the 3-letter agencies in DC — confided that the bishop clearly has a demon.

I find that unsurprising, as ‘Bishop’ Martin — like his namesake James Martin Eth J. for ‘Jesuit’ of New York City, quoted above — is rumored to be homosexually inclined. The two — homosexuality and hatred of God, the Good and One True Faith — go hand in hand. See, for example, Ann Barnhardt on the phenomenon of Diabolical Narcissism, at which Bergoglio excelled.

Such fury toward and hatred of the Old Latin Mass — the most beautiful thing on earth this side of Paradise — is inexplicable other than by demonic inclination, be it oppression or possession. It is akin to the fury of Herodias against St. John the Baptist, whose feast we celebrated last week — and as Shakespeare noted, “Hell hath no fury like a woman scorned,” except maybe for the modern Catholic Lavender Cleric.

The bishop there is on the wrong side of this battle. His manifest hatred for the traditional Latin liturgy and the Old Latin Mass is tantamount to hatred of the Faith.

Many a civilized man and lady (like Agatha Christie) from the world of arts and letters stepped up to urge Paul VI (The Un-Saint in case anyone’s wondering)² not to banish the Old Latin Mass, and many of them were not even Catholic or believers. They were simply defenders of culture and the Good.

As I like to recall, atheist philosopher George Santayana was once asked in Boston whether he attended the Latin Mass, to which he responded: “Yes, I wouldn’t miss it. It is the best show in town.”

It is the liturgy that converted JRR Tolkien, among countless others, who as a philologist as well as a simple believing Catholic and convert, lamented its abolition and loss.

Anyone who would try to destroy that Mass is a barbarian and a savage. As I tried to explain to one of the above parishioners at the flagship Latin Mass parish of Saint Ann’s in downtown Charlotte over coffee and donuts after Sunday Mass last week.

The clerical Sodomfolk — by which I mean the Lavender Cabal in the Vatican and among the bishops worldwide, but particularly in the United States today — fit the savagery bill to a “T.”

But no matter. The truth will soon be revealed.

This Is a “Come to Jesus” Moment for Leo

The pendency of the October 2 demolition of the Latin mass in Charlotte — and the notoriety given this moment by the new movie made by the good people of Charlotte, called Bred Not Stones —

— is forcing a choice upon the new Anti-pope.

The choice for Leo is to do nothing, and let Martin in his bishopric of rage strangle the old Latin Mass and with it five communities of devout Catholics, giving them stones rather than bread. Speaking of which, there is a new movie on point by the suffering folks of Charlotte.

Or, Leo can choose to stop Poof Bishop Martin and his efforts to kill the old Latin Mass.

What will Leo do?

I personally have no doubt, considering that Leo is the Destroyer Bergoglio’s hand-picked successor. Leo was in on it from the beginning as Bergolgio’s handpicked chief of the lavender bishop factory for the past two years before he became Successor-Usurper to Bergoglio. Plus, Leo himself from his bishop-factory post with Anti-Pope Francis made Martin bishop just a year ago in April 2024 A. D.

Finally, Leo Riggitano-Prevost green-lighted Martin’s planned destruction of the Old Latin Mass, the two personally meeting in Rome this year just before Charlotte’s death-knell announcement.

But perhaps even Riggitano-Prevost has a soul buried in there deep down, like the Grinch-Who-Stole-Christmas. Or, a soul and heart of stone buried deep like his protector, mentor, and rabbi Bergoglio, so deep that you can barely see it. If he does save the Old Mass, and spares the flock enormous suffering for no reason, while it still won’t make him pope, at least it may save his soul.

“Grace is everywhere,” as Georges Bernanos closes The Diary of a Country Priest.

We will soon find out if Leo Riggitano-Prevost responds accordingly.

1. The clerical homosexual predator class in the Church has most often been priestly, including cardinals (McCarrick), bishops, and abbots, but also includes ‘religious’ brothers.

2. No canonization by an Anti-Pope destroying Holy Mother Church can be valid. The doctrine of Ecclesia Supplet or supplied jurisdiction is a doctrine that applies for the Good of the Church, not Her harm. Thus it would only supply the jurisdiction that Bergoglio lacked as Anti-Pope only if he acted as such — with good intent to advance the Good of the Church, and not as an anti-pope trying to destroy Holy Mother Church — as was obviously the case to all but the blind. Thus, his acting in bad faith nullifies the doctrine of Ecclesia Supplet, which presupposes acting in good faith. And nope, Bergoglio didn’t have any. This incidentally is the reason why Bergoglio’s cardinal appointments are all NULL and VOID, which is the basis for my position that Leo’s election is completely invalid. “For usurpation engenders only usurpation, children.”